Share your ideas!

Help shape the future of itslearning

Please share your ideas with the community, and contribute by voting and commenting on other ideas – the more votes the more influence! We consider all ideas when planning future work. Please write in English. For support, please contact your school/organization.

  1. As we review all ideas it may take some time before they appear. Unfortunately we cannot comment on all ideas.
  2. Please search for your idea first and vote for it! Do not create new suggestions if they already exist. It reduces your influence.
  3. Unclear or inappropriate suggestions are removed. We may combine your ideas with similar ideas.
  4. We only use the information you share for the purposes of improving itslearning. We want to keep the ideas portal dynamic and relevant, to do this we remove older suggestions.
    • Ideas that have no public engagement after three years, that were not selected for development, are removed.
    • Ideas older than three years and not selected for implementation are removed.
    • Ideas can be resubmitted at any time.

Privacy Policy

Functionality where the teacher can decide whether student peer review is the final marking of the course

When using the "assignment" activity, using the assessment scale and peer review one cannot utilize the given peer assessments (student to student) as the basis of the final assessment/marking. We suggest a functionality where it is up to the teacher/lecturer to define whether the given (numerical) student peer assessments are automatically counted and the average rate is the final mark (number) of the course, or if the teacher/lecturer will decide to give the final mark despite the student peer assessment.

In Finnish: "Kun käyttää Tehtävänanto-aktiviteetissa arviointiasteikkoa ja vertaisarviointia, opiskelijoiden toisilleen antamia arvosanoja ei voi käyttää perusteena tehtävän loppuarvioinnille. Opettajan tulisi voida määritellä, siirtyykö vertaisarvioinnissa opiskelijoiden toisilleen antamien arvosanojen keskiarvo automaattisesti arviointikirjaan kyseisen tehtävän lopulliseksi arvosanaksi, vai haluaako opettaja vertaisarvioinnista huolimatta määritellä loppuarvosanan itse".

  • Susanna Saari
  • Sep 8 2020
  • Not selected for implementation
Country FI
Category Grading and assessment
  • Attach files
  • Susanna Saari commented
    23 Sep, 2020 06:55am

    Hi - at the tender process in December 2019 Turku AMK had a mandatory specification: "our development hopes are listened to and reacted to". Itslearning as the winner has committed to this requirement in Finland when winning the agreement and signing the contract. It is not acceptable that you ignore our requirement and that we need to get votes for development ideas that are crucial for us.

  • Guest commented
    14 Sep, 2020 11:20pm

    its to hard theres so many buttons i dont even know how to submit work right the assignments are supper comfusing like u cant really tell whats the assignments and also the grades honestly google classroom would be better

  • Admin
    Product Team commented
    9 Sep, 2020 06:53am


    Thanks for the idea. This is not part of our current development plans, but if more people suggest a similar idea then we will review this again.

    The itslearning Product Team.